Family Law

Displaying 21 - 30 of 97, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Case Commentary: Montes v. Toscano (In re M.V.U.), 2020 IL App (1st) 191762

James D. Garbolino

March 18, 2021

Domestic Violence | Grave Risk | Child Not a Target of Abuse | No Expert Witness Required to Testify to Psychological Dangers to the Child

This case addressed the question whether domestic violence against a parent poses grave risk to a child.

Case Commentary: Da Silva v. Vieira, No. 6:20-cv-1301-Orl-37GJK, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174167 (M.D. Fla. Sep. 23, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

February 16, 2021

Custody Rights | Grandparent’s Custody Rights | Ne Exeat | Immigration Status | Grave Risk

Case Commentary: Wan v. Debolt, No. 20-cv-3233, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197996 (C.D. Ill. Oct. 26, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

February 16, 2021

Hague Convention in Force

Case Commentary: Pope v. Lunday, No. 20-6003, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 36618 (10th Cir. Nov. 20, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

February 16, 2021

Habitual Residence of Infants | Lack of Necessity of Evidentiary Hearing

Case Commentary: Adkins v. Adkins, No. 19-cv-05535-HSG, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207559 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

February 11, 2021

Attorney Fees | ICARA

Case Commentary: Rizvi v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 20-2136, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 30614 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

November 25, 2020

Jurisdiction

Case Commentary: Jacquety v. Baptista, 2020 WL 5946562 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

November 25, 2020

Jurisdiction | Standing | Redressability

Case Commentary: Smith v. Smith, 976 F.3d 558 (5th Cir. 2020)

James D. Garbolino

November 25, 2020

Habitual Residence | Parental Intent | Precedent

Case Commentary: Farr v. Kendrick, 824 F. App’x 480 (9th Cir. 2020)

James D. Garbolino

November 25, 2020

Habitual Residence | Precedent

Term Talk: June Medical v. Russo, Little Sisters v. Pennsylvania

Erwin Chemerinsky, James A. Chance, Melissa Murray

October 20, 2020

Reproductive Freedom. Experts discuss the constitutionality of admitting privileges requirements for abortion providers, and whether exceptions to ACA-required contraceptive coverage can be administratively expanded to include moral objection.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Family Law

Case Commentary: Montes v. Toscano (In re M.V.U.), 2020 IL App (1st) 191762

Case Commentary: Da Silva v. Vieira, No. 6:20-cv-1301-Orl-37GJK, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174167 (M.D. Fla. Sep. 23, 2020)

Case Commentary: Wan v. Debolt, No. 20-cv-3233, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197996 (C.D. Ill. Oct. 26, 2020)

Case Commentary: Pope v. Lunday, No. 20-6003, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 36618 (10th Cir. Nov. 20, 2020)

Case Commentary: Adkins v. Adkins, No. 19-cv-05535-HSG, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207559 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2020)

Case Commentary: Rizvi v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 20-2136, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 30614 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2020)

Case Commentary: Jacquety v. Baptista, 2020 WL 5946562 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2020)

Case Commentary: Smith v. Smith, 976 F.3d 558 (5th Cir. 2020)

Case Commentary: Farr v. Kendrick, 824 F. App’x 480 (9th Cir. 2020)

Term Talk: June Medical v. Russo, Little Sisters v. Pennsylvania

Pages