Caseloads & Case Weights

Displaying 21 - 30 of 106, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Appendix D: Standard ICMS Event and Relief Code Descriptions

January 1, 2005

Appendix B: Early Public Relations Materials Describing the New Case-Weighting Study

January 1, 2005

Appendix C: Technical Advisory Group Meeting: Participant Information Packet

January 1, 2005

Appendix Z: Announcement of New Weights to the Courts

January 1, 2005

Appendix A: Original FJC Proposal for an Event-Based Case-Weighting Study: Table of Design Components

January 1, 2004

Assessment of Caseload Burden in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit – Report to the Subcommittee on Judicial Statistics of the Committee on Judicial Resources of the Judicial Conference of the United States

Stefanie A. Lindquist, Carol L. Krafka, John E. Shapard

January 1, 1999

The mix of cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit differs markedly from the case mix of other U.S. courts of appeals. The implications of this difference for judicial workload and judgeship needs, however, have been unclear.

District of New Hampshire First Annual Assessment of the Advisory Group Adopted Under the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the District of New Hampshire

March 3, 1997

The annual assessment includes survey results and statistical analysis of the civil and criminal workloads

Assessing the Judicial Workload Associated with Mega Chapter 11 Cases in the Southern District of New York

Elizabeth C. Wiggins

December 16, 1996

Report to the Bankruptcy Committee of the results of adjusting the weighted caseload for the Southern District of New York in accordance with the protocol adopted by the Bankruptcy Committee at the June 1996 meeting.

District of New Mexico Process Innovation Report, August 1996

Robert March

August 23, 1996

Clerk of the Court Robert M. March transmits the District of New Mexico's Process Innovation Report to Abel J. Mattos of the Administrative Office. March describes the report as "an important aspect of the development of the electronic filing Advanced Court Engineering (ACE) project."

Assessing the Judicial Work Load Associated with Mega Chapter 11 Cases

Elizabeth C. Wiggins, Patricia A. Lombard

June 10, 1996

This report revises and expands on the January 1996 report to the Bankruptcy Committee evaluating two approaches that refine assessing judicial workload for Mega Chapter 11 cases and recommendations to the committee for facilitating mega cases in the future.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Caseloads & Case Weights

Appendix D: Standard ICMS Event and Relief Code Descriptions

Appendix B: Early Public Relations Materials Describing the New Case-Weighting Study

Appendix C: Technical Advisory Group Meeting: Participant Information Packet

Appendix Z: Announcement of New Weights to the Courts

Appendix A: Original FJC Proposal for an Event-Based Case-Weighting Study: Table of Design Components

Assessment of Caseload Burden in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit – Report to the Subcommittee on Judicial Statistics of the Committee on Judicial Resources of the Judicial Conference of the United States

District of New Hampshire First Annual Assessment of the Advisory Group Adopted Under the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990

Assessing the Judicial Workload Associated with Mega Chapter 11 Cases in the Southern District of New York

District of New Mexico Process Innovation Report, August 1996

Assessing the Judicial Work Load Associated with Mega Chapter 11 Cases

Pages