You are here
Materials About the Federal Rules
The materials listed below, produced or made available by the Center, are related to the Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure (appellate, bankruptcy, civil, criminal, and evidence).
Click here for curated content on Rules of Practice and Procedure.
Displaying 111 - 120 of 237
Title | Rule(s) | Date |
---|---|---|
Exhibit III-1. Sample Scheduling Order | Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7016, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7026, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed. R. Civil P. 16, Fed. R. Civil P. 26, Federal Rules of Evidence, Fed. R. Evid. 402, Fed. R. Evid. 403 | January 1, 2009 |
Exhibit III-5. Sample Order on Omnibus Objections to Claims | Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4001, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024 | January 1, 2009 |
Exhibit I-5. Sample Order Appointing Claims Agent | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3004 | January 1, 2009 |
Exhibit I-7. Sample Procedures for Complex Chapter 11 Cases | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2002 | January 1, 2009 |
Exhibit II-6. Local Rule on Motion to Use Cash Collateral or Obtain Credit | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4001 | January 1, 2009 |
Exhibit II-2. Sample Order with Respect to Procedures for Prepackaged Chapter 11 Cases | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2002, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3018 | January 1, 2009 |
Impact of the Class Action Fairness Act on the Federal Courts: Preliminary Findings from Phase Two's Pre-CAFA Sample of Diversity Class Actions The preliminary findings presented in this report suggest that, in diversity class actions, there is less to class allegations than one would expect. There was relatively little motions activity in the typical case, and the majority of cases not remanded to state court were voluntarily dismissed. Most plaintiffs did not move to certify a class. But all class actions in which a class was certified, whether for litigation or settlement purposes, ended with class settlements. |
Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed. R. Civil P. 23 | November 1, 2008 |
Report on Summary Judgment Practice Across Districts with Variations in Local Rules The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules asked the Federal Judicial Center to examine summary judgment practice across federal district courts as a means of assessing the potential impact of proposed amendments to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. |
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed. R. Civil P. 56 | August 13, 2008 |
Form 13: Minute Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed. R. Civil P. 26 | April 16, 2008 |
The Impact of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 on the Federal Courts: Fourth Interim Report to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) (Pub. L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005)) expanded the federal courts' diversity of citizenship jurisdiction over class action litigation. Congress's intent was, in part, to shift some class action litigation from the state courts to the federal courts. Passage of the Act sparked concerns about the impact of these additional class actions on the federal courts' rocedures and workload. In light of these concerns, the Judicial Conference's Advisory Committee on Civil Rules (Advisory Committee)1 asked the Federal Judicial Center (FJC) to study the impact of CAFA on the federal courts. This report marks the end of the first phase of the FJC study on the impact of CAFA on the number of class actions initiated in the federal courts. This report presents interim findings on class actions filings and removals in the federal courts from July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2007. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that CAFA has caused an increased number of class actions based on diversity of citizenship jurisdiction to be filed in the federal courts. |
Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed. R. Civil P. 23 | April 1, 2008 |