You are here

Evidence

Displaying 91 - 100 of 120, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Daniel J. Capra
October 3, 2000

This report is an effort to increase the awareness of counsel practicing in federal courts, as well as judges, about the possibility that case law has diverged from the text of some of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Royce C. Lamberth
August 15, 2000

Opinion, Horn v. Huddle, No. 1:94-cv-1756 (D.D.C. Aug. 15, 2000, refiled June 9, 2009), D.E. 340.

Howard M. Kipen, Mary Sue Henifin, Susan R. Poulter
January 1, 2000
D. Michal Freedman, Leon Gordis, Michael D. Green
January 1, 2000
David H. Kaye, George F. Sensabaugh
January 1, 2000
David Goodstein
January 1, 2000
Carol L. Krafka, Joe S. Cecil, Molly Johnson
January 1, 2000

In 1998, the Federal Judicial Center surveyed federal judges about their experiences with expert testimony in civil cases.

Daniel J. Capra
July 21, 1998

At the request of the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules, Professor Daniel Capra, committee reporter, listed instances where Congress either rejected or substantially changed rules before passage, thus rendering advisory committee notes possibly confusing.

Pages

Subscribe to Evidence