Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure

Displaying 41 - 50 of 90, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Survey of District Court Judges on a Proposed Amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) Concerning Prior Consistent Statements

Tim Reagan, Margaret S. Williams

March 2, 2012

This report was prepared for the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence. Under the current version of Fed. R. Evid.

Early Stages of Litigation Attorney Survey: Report to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules

Emery G. Lee

March 1, 2012

This report summarizes the findings of a study of the operation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) and 16(b) in a nationwide sample of recently terminated civil cases.

The Timing of Scheduling Orders and Discovery Cut-Off Dates

Emery G. Lee

October 1, 2011

The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules asked the Federal Judicial Center to study the operation of Rules 16 and 26(f) in the district courts. This report summarizes findings of part of that study.

Motions for Sanctions Based Upon Spoliation of Evidence in Civil Cases: Report to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules

Emery G. Lee

June 6, 2011

In 2010, the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules requested a study of motions for sanctions based on an allegation that the nonmoving party had destroyed evidence, especially electronically stored information (ESI).

Comparative Study of the Taxation of Costs in the Circuit Courts of Appeals Under Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure: Report to the Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules of the Judicial Conference of the United States

Marie Leary

April 1, 2011

The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules requested this report on circuit practices for awarding costs under Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Sealing Court Records and Proceedings: A Pocket Guide

Robert Timothy Reagan

December 15, 2010

Court case records and proceedings are presumptively public, but occasionally there are compelling reasons for keeping all or parts of them confidential, sometimes permanently but often only temporarily.

Social Security Numbers in Federal Court Documents

George W. Cort, Joe S. Cecil

April 5, 2010

Memorandum to the Privacy Subcommittee of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, April 5, 2010.

Appendix E-4: Middle District of Florida — General Procedure Order

March 1, 2010

A Study of the Role and Impact of Special Masters in Patent Cases

Jay P. Kesan, Gwendolyn G. Ball

March 25, 2009

Report of a study of the use of special masters in patent litigation.

Exhibit III-4. Local Rule on Omnibus Objections to Claims

January 1, 2009

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure

Survey of District Court Judges on a Proposed Amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) Concerning Prior Consistent Statements

Early Stages of Litigation Attorney Survey: Report to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules

The Timing of Scheduling Orders and Discovery Cut-Off Dates

Motions for Sanctions Based Upon Spoliation of Evidence in Civil Cases: Report to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules

Comparative Study of the Taxation of Costs in the Circuit Courts of Appeals Under Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure: Report to the Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules of the Judicial Conference of the United States

Sealing Court Records and Proceedings: A Pocket Guide

Social Security Numbers in Federal Court Documents

Appendix E-4: Middle District of Florida — General Procedure Order

A Study of the Role and Impact of Special Masters in Patent Cases

Exhibit III-4. Local Rule on Omnibus Objections to Claims

Pages