Federal Judicial Center Operational Status:

Due to a lapse in appropriations, the Federal Judicial Center (Center) has ceased all non-excepted activities until funding is restored.

The Center will post any changes in operational status on this web page. Please check back for updates.

Discovery & Disclosure

Displaying 321 - 330 of 493, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Memo: Civil Justice Reform Act Implementation

Robert Manley Parker

October 22, 1992

Updates chief judges and advisory group chairs on the implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act.

Judicial Conference of the United States Model Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan

October 1, 1992

Judicial Conference's template of a district plan for cost and delay reduction, with alternatives based on the plans of Early Implementation Districts

Memo: Updated Materials and Information Regarding Implementation of the CJRA

Donna J. Stienstra, Abel J. Mattos

September 30, 1992

This memo from CJRA Project Directors at the Administrative Office and the Federal Judicial Center provides court clerks and advisory group members with contact information, timetables, guidelines and a list of Federal Judicial Center resources that they can use to implement the provisions of the

Letter: Cost and Delay Reduction Plan Under the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Southern District of Texas, James S. Kakalik

September 10, 1992

James Kakalik of the Rand Corporation thanks Mark Shapiro of the Administrative Office for sending him the Civil Justice Reform Act report and plan for Southern District of Texas. He includes the report, plan, and appendices in his correspondence

Northern District of Ohio Differentiated Case Management Plan and Recommendations With Suggested Rules August 1, 1991 Discussion Draft

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Northern District of Ohio

August 1, 1992

A discussion draft of the Expense and Delay Reduction Plan proposed by the Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Northern District of Ohio.

Model Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan

July 30, 1992

Draft of the Judicial Conference's template of a district plan for cost and delay reduction, to be edited and published by September

Letter: General Order 34 Case Management Pilot Program for the Northern District of California

Nina K. Srejovic

July 16, 1992

Court Coordinator Nina K. Srejovic transmits General Order 34 (Case Management Pilot Program) to Abel J. Mattos of the Administrative Office

Eastern District of Michigan Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 Report of the Advisory Group

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Eastern District of Michigan

July 1, 1992

The Civil Justice Advisory Group report for the Eastern District of Michigan

Civil Justice Reform Act Report: Development and Implementation of Plans by Early Implementation Districts and Pilot Courts (Draft)

Judicial Conference, Leonidas Ralph Mecham

June 1, 1992

This report to the Senate and the House Judiciary Committees includes information on the progress and procedures of CJRA implementation, the contents of district plans, and the results of implementation in pilot courts.

Western District of Missouri Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan

Howard F. Sachs, Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Western District of Missouri

May 19, 1992

A chain correspondence between Chief Judge Howard F. Sachs and Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham. Includes both the Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan for the Western District of Missouri and the Local Order adopting it on April 30th, 1992.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here