Federal Judicial Center Operational Status:

Due to a lapse in appropriations, the Federal Judicial Center (Center) has ceased all non-excepted activities until funding is restored.

The Center will post any changes in operational status on this web page. Please check back for updates.

About Advisory Committees

Displaying 1 - 5 of 5, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Appendix E: Judge Advisory Group Meeting: Participant Information Packet

January 1, 2005

Advisory Committee Notes to the Federal Rules of Evidence That May Require Clarification

Daniel J. Capra

July 21, 1998

At the request of the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules, Professor Daniel Capra, committee reporter, listed instances where Congress either rejected or substantially changed rules before passage, thus rendering advisory committee notes possibly confusing.

Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts

James S. Kakalik, Terence Dunworth, Laural A. Hill, Daniel McCaffrey, Marian Oshiro, Nicholas M. Pace, Mary E. Vaiana

January 29, 1997

Institute for Civil Justice, Rand Corporation.

Protective Order Activity in Three Federal Judicial Districts: Interim Report to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules

Elizabeth C. Wiggins, Melissa J. Pecherski

October 14, 1994

Interim report to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules providing information that was used in evaluating the need for additional provisions in the rules relating to sealed court records and sealed settlement agreements.

Experimentation in the Law: Report of the Federal Judicial Center Advisory Committee on Experimentation in the Law

Edward D. Re, Alvin Bronstein, Wilfred Feinberg, Paul A. Freund, Joseph Tyree Sneed III, Alexander M. Capron, Jane Frank-Harman, Gerald Gunther, Alasdair MacIntyre, Norman Redlich, Jerome J. Shestack, Abraham D. Sofaer, June Louin Tapp

January 1, 1981

The committee examined the ethical and legal problems posed by experimentation with innovative programs and procedures in the justice system.

You are here