U.S. Courts of Appeals

Displaying 71 - 80 of 140, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Case Commentary: Mozes v. Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2001)

James D. Garbolino

February 23, 2016

Habitual Residence

Mozes remains the most-followed case for determining habitual residence and stands out as the most-cited circuit case dealing with the 1980 Convention.

Facts

Case Commentary: Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S. Ct. 1017 (2013)

James D. Garbolino

February 2, 2016

Mootness | Stays | Expeditious Handling

Case Commentary: Abbott v. Abbott, 560 U.S. 1 (2010)

James D. Garbolino

January 21, 2016

Interpreting the Convention | Custody Rights | Ne Exeat Clauses^{^[1]}

Case Commentary: Blondin v. Dubois (Blondin I), 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999), & Blondin v. Dubois (Blondin II), 238 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2001)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Grave Risk | Domestic Violence

Case Commentary: Redmond v. Redmond, 724 F.3d 729 (7th Cir. 2013)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Order Compelling Parent to Return | Recognition or Enforcement of Custody Orders | No Retroactive Wrongful Retention | Habitual Residence

Case Commentary: Nicolson v. Pappalardo, 605 F.3d 100 (1st Cir. 2010)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Consent and Acquiescence

Article 13 establishes a defense to return when the left-behind parent has consented or acquiesced to the removal or retention of the child. Consent or acquiescence, however, must be clearly established.

Facts

Case Commentary: Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Abstention | Child Well Settled | Equitable Estoppel | Delay

Case Commentary: Mendez v. May, 778 F.3d 337 (1st Cir. 2015)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Habitual Residence

Facts

Case Commentary: E.R.S.C. v. Carlwig (In re A.L.C.), 607 Fed. Appx. 658 (9th Cir. 2015)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Habitual Residence

Facts

Case Commentary: Karkkainen v. Kovalchuk, 445 F.3d 280 (3d Cir. 2006)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Habitual Residence

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Case Commentary: Mozes v. Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2001)

Case Commentary: Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S. Ct. 1017 (2013)

Case Commentary: Abbott v. Abbott, 560 U.S. 1 (2010)

Case Commentary: Blondin v. Dubois (Blondin I), 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999), & Blondin v. Dubois (Blondin II), 238 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2001)

Case Commentary: Redmond v. Redmond, 724 F.3d 729 (7th Cir. 2013)

Case Commentary: Nicolson v. Pappalardo, 605 F.3d 100 (1st Cir. 2010)

Case Commentary: Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998)

Case Commentary: Mendez v. May, 778 F.3d 337 (1st Cir. 2015)

Case Commentary: E.R.S.C. v. Carlwig (In re A.L.C.), 607 Fed. Appx. 658 (9th Cir. 2015)

Case Commentary: Karkkainen v. Kovalchuk, 445 F.3d 280 (3d Cir. 2006)

Pages