11th Cir.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 64, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Case Commentary: Romero v. Bahamonde, 857 Fed. App’x 576 (11th Cir. 2021)

James D. Garbolino

November 16, 2022

Objection of the Child | Manner of Hearing | Wishes vs. Objections | Immigration Status and Settlement

Case Commentary: Berenguela-Alvarado v. Castanos, 950 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2020)

James D. Garbolino

May 4, 2020

Factual Error | Burden of Proof

Case Commentary: Pfeiffer v. Bachotet, 913 F.3d 1018 (11th Cir. 2019)

James D. Garbolino

November 6, 2019

Custody Rights | Habitual Residence

Facts

Case Commentary: Palencia v. Perez, 921 F.4d 1333 (11th Cir. 2019)

James D. Garbolino

November 5, 2019

Custody Rights | Wrongful Retention

Case Commentary: Grau v. Grau, 780 F. App’x 787 (11th Cir. 2019)

James D. Garbolino

November 1, 2019

Habitual Residence

Facts

Case Commentary: Fernandez v. Bailey, 909 F.3d 353 (11th Cir. 2018)

James D. Garbolino

January 18, 2019

Article 18 Discretion to Return Child | Settlement | Repeated Abductions

Case Commentary: Gomez v. Fuenmayor, 812 F.3d 1005 (11th Cir. 2016)

James D. Garbolino

March 4, 2016

Grave Risk | Domestic Violence

Even though the child is not directly harmed by violent conduct against a parent and his or her family, the child may be subjected to grave risk of physical and/or psychological harm as a result of that violence.

Case Commentary: Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Abstention | Child Well Settled | Equitable Estoppel | Delay

Analysis of Briefing Requirements in the United States Courts of Appeals

Marie Leary

November 30, 2004

The Federal Judicial Center prepared this report to assist the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure to evaluate reported problems with and potential amendments to Rules 28 and 32 on the content and cover of briefs.

Annual Assessment of the Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan for Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 in the Southern District of Florida

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Southern District of Florida

September 30, 1995

The 1995 Periodic Assessment of civil justice reform efforts in the Southern District of Florida

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

11th Cir.

Case Commentary: Romero v. Bahamonde, 857 Fed. App’x 576 (11th Cir. 2021)

Case Commentary: Berenguela-Alvarado v. Castanos, 950 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2020)

Case Commentary: Pfeiffer v. Bachotet, 913 F.3d 1018 (11th Cir. 2019)

Case Commentary: Palencia v. Perez, 921 F.4d 1333 (11th Cir. 2019)

Case Commentary: Grau v. Grau, 780 F. App’x 787 (11th Cir. 2019)

Case Commentary: Fernandez v. Bailey, 909 F.3d 353 (11th Cir. 2018)

Case Commentary: Gomez v. Fuenmayor, 812 F.3d 1005 (11th Cir. 2016)

Case Commentary: Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998)

Analysis of Briefing Requirements in the United States Courts of Appeals

Annual Assessment of the Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan for Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 in the Southern District of Florida

Pages