You are here

Evidence

Displaying 111 - 120 of 125, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2025
Greater than or equal to
Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging
January 1, 1994

Offers suggestions for the use of court-appointed experts pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 706.

January 1, 1994

Offers suggestions for effective use of the reference guides to specific areas of scientific evidence.

Margaret A. Berger
January 1, 1994

Offers an analytical framework for judges considering disputes over qualifications of experts and admissibility of scientific evidence.

William W Schwarzer
January 1, 1994

Offers suggestions for effective management of expert testimony involving scientific issues.

William W Schwarzer
January 1, 1994

Offers an overview of manual and explanation of its purpose.

Joe S. Cecil, Marie Leary, William W Schwarzer, D. Dean P. Miletich
January 1, 1994

Explains origin of project and acknowledges contributions of individuals and organizations.

Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging
January 1, 1993

A study of why judges rarely appoint experts under Rule 706. In discussing this issue with judges, the authors learned of techniques and procedures that may aid judges when considering whether to appoint an expert or when managing an expert who has been appointed.

Bruce M. Clarke, Deirdre Golash, Donald S. Voorhees
January 1, 1990

The third edition of the late Judge Voorhees's manual collecting decisions on procedural problems arising in criminal trials.

Thomas E. Willging
January 1, 1986

A description of the appointment of expert witnesses under Federal Rule of Evidence 706. The report discusses procedures for appointing an expert and for payment of the costs.

Donald S. Voorhees
January 1, 1985

A collection of decisions on procedural problems arising in criminal trials, from material originally presented at Center seminars for newly appointed district judges.

Pages

Subscribe to Evidence