You are here

Evidence

Displaying 111 - 120 of 128, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2026
Greater than or equal to

Proposed Research Conference on Disputes and Litigation Over Delivery of Health Care Services

Joe S. Cecil
October 1, 1996

Proposal seeks funding to underwrite conference to "identify opportunities for research on the relationship between litigation and the delivery of health care services." Issues raised would become subjects of empirical study by smaller groups.

Read more

Manual on Recurring Problems in Criminal Trials, Fourth Edition [Superseded]

Donald S. Voorhees, Genevra Kay Loveland
January 1, 1996

The fourth edition of the late Judge Voorhees's guide to the law governing many of the procedural matters that arise in criminal trials.

Read more

Index [Superseded]

January 1, 1994
Read more

Court-Appointed Experts [Superseded]

Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging
January 1, 1994

Offers suggestions for the use of court-appointed experts pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 706.

Read more

Comments on the Use of the Reference Guides [Superseded]

January 1, 1994

Offers suggestions for effective use of the reference guides to specific areas of scientific evidence.

Read more

Evidentiary Framework [Superseded]

Margaret A. Berger
January 1, 1994

Offers an analytical framework for judges considering disputes over qualifications of experts and admissibility of scientific evidence.

Read more

Management of Expert Evidence [Superseded]

William W Schwarzer
January 1, 1994

Offers suggestions for effective management of expert testimony involving scientific issues.

Read more

Introduction [Superseded]

William W Schwarzer
January 1, 1994

Offers an overview of manual and explanation of its purpose.

Read more

Preface [Superseded]

Joe S. Cecil, Marie Leary, William W Schwarzer, D. Dean P. Miletich
January 1, 1994

Explains origin of project and acknowledges contributions of individuals and organizations.

Read more

Court-Appointed Experts: Defining the Role of Experts Appointed Under Federal Rule of Evidence 706

Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging
January 1, 1993

A study of why judges rarely appoint experts under Rule 706. In discussing this issue with judges, the authors learned of techniques and procedures that may aid judges when considering whether to appoint an expert or when managing an expert who has been appointed.

Read more

Pages

Subscribe to Evidence