You are here

S.D.N.Y.

Displaying 21 - 30 of 96
Contains
Contains
Format: 2019
Greater than or equal to
Available Online Only

Assembled here are protective orders used by federal judges in criminal prosecutions in national security cases. Among the most important goals of the protective orders here is the protection of classified information.

Superseded by National Security Prosecutions: Protective Orders (2014).

Available Online Only

Assembled here are jury questionnaires used by federal judges in criminal prosecutions in national security cases. Also included are prepared preliminary remarks for prospective jurors in some cases.

United States v. Haouari (S.D.N.Y. 1:00-cr-15).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

United States v. Ghailani (S.D.N.Y. 1:98-cr-1023-9).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

United States v. Ghailani (S.D.N.Y. 1:98-cr-1023-9).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

United States v. Ghailani (S.D.N.Y. 1:98-cr-1023-9).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

United States v. El Hage (S.D.N.Y. 1:98-cr-1023).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

United States v. Ghailani (S.D.N.Y. 1:98-cr-1023-9).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Available Online Only

At its Fall 2007 meeting, the Appellate Rules Advisory Committee discussed the current circuit split over whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 7 authorizes the inclusion of attorney fees in a bond for costs on appeal. This item has been brought back before the Committee as it determines whether, in light of recent case law developments, to proceed with a proposed amendment approved by the Committee in 2003 which made clear that FRAP 7 bond "costs" do not include attorney fees. This report describes an exploratory study undertaken by the FJC of FRAP 7 bond activity in three federal district courts: the Southern District of New York, the Central District of California, and the Eastern District of Michigan. These districts are in circuits that permit attorney fees to be included in FRAP 7 cost bonds.

Pages

Subscribe to S.D.N.Y.