You are here

S.D.N.Y.

Displaying 21 - 30 of 107, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Ronnie Abrams
February 24, 2023

Opinion, Tanvir v. Tanzin, No. 1:13-cv-6951 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2023), D.E. 149, 2023 WL 2216256, appeal pending, No. 23-738 (2d Cir. docketed Apr. 26, 2023).

George B. Daniels
February 21, 2023

Opinion, In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, No. 1:03-md-1570 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 21, 2023), D.E. 8866, ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, 2023 WL 2138691.

Sarah Netburn
August 26, 2022

Report and Recommendation, In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, No. 1:03-md-1570 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2022), D.E. 8463, 2022 WL 4643442.

James D. Garbolino
November 25, 2020

Jurisdiction | Standing | Redressability

July 27, 2017

The Advisory Group to the New York State–Federal Judicial Council completed a best practices document on interpreters in federal and New York state courts that was approved on May 18, 2015 by the New York State–Federal Judicial Council.

July 27, 2017

The Advisory Group to the New York State–Federal Judicial Council analyzed New York State and federal courts’ treatment of prelitigation conduct involving the creation, retention, and destruction of electronically stored information (ESI) to determine whether the courts were consistent and harmon

May 30, 2017

This handbook was developed by the Advisory Group to the New York State and Federal Judicial Council to provide readily accessible guidance to attorneys working on cases in the U.S.

May 30, 2017

In 2016, the New York State–Federal Judicial Council prepared this report on the coordination of discovery between New York state and federal courts. 

Margaret S. Williams, Rebecca N. Eyre, Joe S. Cecil
April 1, 2016

The Patent Pilot Program (PPP), a ten-year pilot program addressing the assignment of patent cases in certain U.S. district courts, was established on January 4, 2011, by Pub. L. No. 111-349.

Meghan A. Dunn
January 1, 2014

This report summarizes the results of a Center survey of district court judges to assess the frequency with which jurors used social media to communicate during trials and deliberations in the past two years, and to identify strategies for curbing this behavior.

Pages

Subscribe to S.D.N.Y.