E.D. Tex.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 29, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

No Standing to Compel the Vice President to Exercise Discretion in Confirming Electoral College Results

Robert Timothy Reagan

November 3, 2023

Gohmert v. Pence (Jeremy D. Kernodle, E.D. Tex. 6:20-cv-660)

Challenge to a Local Recall Election

Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

October 29, 2023

McBride v. City of Jasper (Zack Hawthorn, E.D. Tex. 1:11-cv-443)

Preclearance of an Election to Create a Hospital District

Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

October 6, 2023

Hernandez v. Kirkham (Marcia A. Crone, E.D. Tex. 1:05-cv-134)

School-Bond Opposition Dilution

Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

August 25, 2023

Duke v. Lawson (Charles Everingham IV, E.D. Tex. 2:11-cv-246)

Unsuccessfully Challenging Private Grants to Local Election Authorities

Robert Timothy Reagan

August 22, 2023

Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. City of Racine (William C. Griesbach, E.D. Wis. 1:20-cv-1487), Pennsylvania Voters Alliance v. Centre County (Matthew W. Brann, M.D. Pa. 4:20-cv-1761), Texas Voters Alliance v. Dallas County (Amos L. Mazzant, E.D. Tex.

Opt-in: Potential Workload Implications for the Federal Judiciary

Margaret S. Williams, Barbara Meierhoefer

February 6, 2020

In late 2017, the Committee on Defender Services (Committee) asked the Federal Judicial Center to generate a white paper on the potential effects on the federal courts and the defender services program of a determination that states have “opted in” to special expedited procedures created by the A

Patent Pilot Program: Five-Year Report

Margaret S. Williams, Rebecca N. Eyre, Joe S. Cecil

April 1, 2016

The Patent Pilot Program (PPP), a ten-year pilot program addressing the assignment of patent cases in certain U.S. district courts, was established on January 4, 2011, by Pub. L. No. 111-349.

Jurors' Use of Social Media During Trials and Deliberations: A Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management

Meghan A. Dunn

November 22, 2011

The Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management (CACM) asked the Federal Judicial Center to develop and administer a short survey of district court judges to assess the frequency with which jurors use social media to communicate about cases during trial and deliberat

Appendix C-1: Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit — Special Procedures for Reviewing Attorney Compensation Requests in Death Penalty Cases

March 1, 2010

Notice of Intent — Eastern District of Texas (Lufkin Division)

May 18, 2001

Source: Managing Federal Death Penalty Trials, Orders and Forms

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

E.D. Tex.

No Standing to Compel the Vice President to Exercise Discretion in Confirming Electoral College Results

Challenge to a Local Recall Election

Preclearance of an Election to Create a Hospital District

School-Bond Opposition Dilution

Unsuccessfully Challenging Private Grants to Local Election Authorities

Opt-in: Potential Workload Implications for the Federal Judiciary

Patent Pilot Program: Five-Year Report

Jurors' Use of Social Media During Trials and Deliberations: A Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management

Appendix C-1: Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit — Special Procedures for Reviewing Attorney Compensation Requests in Death Penalty Cases

Notice of Intent — Eastern District of Texas (Lufkin Division)

Pages