You are here

D.N.J.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 51
Contains
Contains
Format: 2019
Greater than or equal to
January 30, 2019
Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

Democratic National Committee v. Republican National Committee (Dickinson R. Debevoise and John Michael Vazquez, D.N.J. 2:81-cv-3876), Arizona Democratic Party v. Arizona Republican Party (John J. Tuchi, D. Ariz. 2:16-cv-3752), Nevada State Democratic Party v. Nevada Republican Party (Richard F. Boulware II, D. Nev. 2:16-cv-2514), Ohio Democratic Party v. Ohio Republican Party (James S. Gwin, N.D. Ohio 1:16-cv-2645), Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Republican Party of Pennsylvania (Paul S. Diamond, E.D. Pa. 2:16-cv-5664), North Carolina Democratic Party v.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 9 pages
March 9, 2017
Robert Timothy Reagan

New Jersey Democratic State Committee v. New Jersey Oath Keepers (Jose L. Linares, D.N.J. 2:16-cv-8230)
Four days before a general election, a party committee filed a federal complaint to enjoin voter intimidation allegedly encouraged by a website that urged “incognito intelligence gathering” on election day. The district court “fail[ed] to see how Defendant’s members could intimidate voters who are not even aware of their presence.”
Topic: Campaign materials.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 1 page
April 1, 2016
Margaret S. Williams, Rebecca N. Eyre, Joe S. Cecil

The Patent Pilot Program (PPP), a ten-year pilot program addressing the assignment of patent cases in certain U.S. district courts, was established on January 4, 2011, by Pub. L. No. 111-349. At the request of the Judicial Conference’s Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, the Federal Judicial Center has been studying the PPP since the program's inception.

March 5, 2014
Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

Caldwell v. United States Office of Special Counsel (Freda L. Wolfson, D.N.J. 1:05-cv-5126)
A deputy sheriff filed a federal complaint seeking relief and clarification of his right to run for sheriff as a Republican nominee after the Democratic incumbent transferred him to a department receiving federal funds so that his candidacy might violate the Hatch Act. The district judge held telephone conferences with the parties one and two days later. At a hearing five days after the complaint was filed, the parties announced a confidential settlement.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 1 page
September 12, 2013
Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

Page v. Bartels (Dickinson R. Debevoise, D.N.J. 2:01-cv-1733)

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 1 page
June 1, 2011

Assembled here are protective orders used by federal judges in criminal prosecutions in national security cases. Among the most important goals of the protective orders here is the protection of classified information.

Superseded by National Security Prosecutions: Protective Orders (2014).

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Download 307 pages
March 1, 2011

Assembled here are jury questionnaires used by federal judges in criminal prosecutions in national security cases. Also included are prepared preliminary remarks for prospective jurors in some cases.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Download 389 pages
January 1, 2010
Downloadable file:
PDF icon Download 3 pages
September 29, 2008
Robert B. Kugler

United States v. Shnewer (D.N.J. 1:07-cr-459).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:
August 14, 2008
Robert B. Kugler

United States v. Shnewer (D.N.J. 1:07-cr-459).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:

Pages

Subscribe to D.N.J.