Federal Rules of Evidence

Displaying 21 - 30 of 30, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Managing Discovery of Electronic Information: A Pocket Guide for Judges, Second Edition [Superseded]

Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, Ronald J. Hedges, Elizabeth C. Wiggins

May 21, 2012

This second-edition pocket guide helps federal judges manage the discovery of electronically stored information (ESI).

Survey of District Court Judges on a Proposed Amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) Concerning Prior Consistent Statements

Tim Reagan, Margaret S. Williams

March 2, 2012

This report was prepared for the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence. Under the current version of Fed. R. Evid.

Exhibit III-1. Sample Scheduling Order

January 1, 2009

Managing Discovery of Electronic Information: A Pocket Guide for Judges [Superseded]

Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, Elizabeth C. Wiggins, Ronald J. Hedges

January 1, 2007

This pocket guide helps federal judges manage the discovery of electronically stored information (ESI).

Neutral Science Panels: Two Examples of Panels of Court-Appointed Experts in the Breast Implants Product Liability Litigation

Laural L. Hooper, Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging

June 15, 2001

This report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management describes two different types of independent panels used in the silicone gel breast implants litigation.

Case Law Divergence from the Federal Rules of Evidence

Daniel J. Capra

October 3, 2000

This report is an effort to increase the awareness of counsel practicing in federal courts, as well as judges, about the possibility that case law has diverged from the text of some of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Advisory Committee Notes to the Federal Rules of Evidence That May Require Clarification

Daniel J. Capra

July 21, 1998

At the request of the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules, Professor Daniel Capra, committee reporter, listed instances where Congress either rejected or substantially changed rules before passage, thus rendering advisory committee notes possibly confusing.

Issues re Proposed Amendments to FRE 706

Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging

January 27, 1997

Letter to Professor Daniel J. Capra, Reporter, Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence.

Court-Appointed Experts: Defining the Role of Experts Appointed Under Federal Rule of Evidence 706

Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging

January 1, 1993

A study of why judges rarely appoint experts under Rule 706. In discussing this issue with judges, the authors learned of techniques and procedures that may aid judges when considering whether to appoint an expert or when managing an expert who has been appointed.

FJC Directions, No. 4

Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging, Emily Z. Huebner

August 1, 1992

A magazine that reported Center research and education activities in a concise format. In this issue of FJC Directions:

Federal Judicial Center

You are here