You are here

Scientific Evidence

Displaying 11 - 20 of 58, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Timothy T. Lau
March 5, 2016

This review of scientific literature regarding the reliability of present sense impressions and excited utterances as it pertains to the Federal Rules of Evidence was presented as a memorandum to the Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence.

Paul S. Appelbaum
January 1, 2011

The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by providing examples of cases in which that e

John B. Wong, Lawrence O. Gostin, Oscar A. Cabrera
January 1, 2011

The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by providing examples of cases in which that e

D. Michal Freedman, Leon Gordis, Michael D. Green
January 1, 2011

The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by providing examples of cases in which that e

Stephen G. Breyer, Margaret A. Berger, David Goodstein, Edward J. Imwinkelried, Paul C. Giannelli, Joseph L. Peterson, David H. Kaye, George F. Sensabaugh, David A. Freedman, Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Shari Seidman Diamond, Mark A. Allen, Robert E. Hall, Victoria A. Lazear, Joseph V. Rodricks, Michael D. Green, D. Michal Freedman, Leon Gordis, Bernard D. Goldstein, Mary Sue Henifin, John B. Wong, Lawrence O. Gostin, Oscar A. Cabrera, Anthony D. Wagner, Channing R. Robertson, David L. Black, John E. Moalli, Paul S. Appelbaum
January 1, 2011

The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by

David A. Freedman, David H. Kaye
January 1, 2011

The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by providing examples of cases in which that e

Edward J. Imwinkelried, Joseph L. Peterson, Paul C. Giannelli
January 1, 2011

The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by providing examples of cases in which that e

Margaret A. Berger
January 1, 2011

In 1993, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals ushered in a new era with regard to the admissibility of expert testimony. As expert testimony has become increasingly essential in a wide variety of litigated cases, the Daubert opinion has had an enormous impact.

January 1, 2011

The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by providing examples of cases in which that e

Channing R. Robertson, David L. Black, John E. Moalli
January 1, 2011

The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by providing examples of cases in which that e

Pages

Subscribe to Scientific Evidence