First Amendment. Public Accommodations. Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s emerging artistic expression exception to public accommodations laws, and the opinion’s potential impact on anti-discrimination laws in general.
Edwin Chemerinsky, James A. Chance, Michael McConnell
October 14, 2021
Free Exercise of Religion. Watch experts discuss the Court’s shift toward a more robust Free Exercise Clause in the context of contracting and COVID restrictions, and the red flag raised by government discretionary decision making.
Free Speech and Free Association. Watch experts discuss the Court’s first look at public school regulation of off campus student speech, and the burden donor disclosure requirements have on Free Association rights.
Erwin Chemerinsky, Michael McConnell, Elizabeth C. Wiggins
December 21, 2020
Free Exercise of Religion. Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s shift away from a strong Establishment Clause toward a more robust Free Exercise Clause when considering the constitutionality of giving public aid to religious organizations.
Erwin Chemerinsky, James A. Chance, Melissa Murray
October 20, 2020
Reproductive Freedom. Experts discuss the constitutionality of admitting privileges requirements for abortion providers, and whether exceptions to ACA-required contraceptive coverage can be administratively expanded to include moral objection.
Erwin Chemerinsky, Laurie Levenson, Elizabeth C. Wiggins
October 7, 2020
Sex Discrimination under Title VII. Watch discussion about how the expanded definition of sex to include sexual orientation and identity will impact future litigation.
John S. Cooke, James A. Chance, Elizabeth C. Wiggins, Erwin Chemerinsky, Laurie Levenson, Suzanna Sherry, Anne Fleming
July 9, 2018
Some of the nation’s top legal scholars discuss the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017–2018 term and analyze the decisions that are most likely to affect the work of federal judges.
Some of the nation's top legal scholars discuss the U.S. Supreme Court's 2016–2017 term and analyze the decisions that are most likely to affect the work of federal judges.