Federal Judicial Center Operational Status:

Due to a lapse in appropriations, the Federal Judicial Center (Center) has ceased all non-excepted activities until funding is restored.

The Center will post any changes in operational status on this web page. Please check back for updates.

Discovery & Disclosure

Displaying 441 - 450 of 493, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Memo: Judicial Conference Guidance Regarding S. 2027

Karen K. Siegel, Robert E. Fiedler

March 9, 1990

Robert E. Feidler and Karen K. Siegel write to the Judicial Conference Executive Committee about the Judicial Conference Guidance and Principles, attached

Letter: Senate Judiciary Committee Questions for Judge Aubrey E. Robinson

Joseph R. Biden

March 7, 1990

The Senate Judiciary Committee Questions for Judge Aubrey E. Robinson, transmitted by Senator Biden

Statement By The Honorable Robert F. Peckham About Title I Of S. 2648 Civil Justice Expense And Delay Reduction Plans

Robert F. Peckham

March 6, 1990

The Prepared Statement of Judge Robert F. Peckham as presented in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee

Judiciary Committee Questions for Judges Robinson and Enslen

Richard Alan Enslen, Aubrey Eugene Robinson Jr., Strom Thurmond, Orrin G. Hatch

March 6, 1990

The transcript of the Senate Judiciary Committee testimony of Judges Aubrey E. Robinson and Richard A. Enslen

Prepared Statement of Honorable Aubrey E. Robinson, Jr. Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia on Behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States Before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate on S. 2027,

Aubrey Eugene Robinson Jr.

March 6, 1990

Chief Judge Aubrey E. Robinson's Prepared Statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee on S. 2027

Letter: Observations on the Present Senate Bill Entitled "Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990"

John Winslow Bissell

February 28, 1990

Judge John W. Bissell of the District of New Jersey writes to Jeffrey J. Peck in order to share his opinions about the Civil Justice Reform Act. Attached is a New Jersey Law Journal article by Henry Gottlieb entitled "U.S. Judges Blast Speed-Up Bill"

Memo: The Brookings Taskforce for Civil Reform Report "Justice for All"

Paul Summitt, James E. Macklin Jr., Brookings Task Force on Civil Justice Reform

October 27, 1989

Paul Summitt and James E. Macklin, Jr. transmit the Brookings Taskforce for Civil Reform report entitled "Justice for All"

Form 4: Guidelines for Discovery, Motion Practice and Trial

January 1, 1988

Attorneys' Views of Local Rules Limiting Interrogatories

Carroll Seron, John E. Shapard

January 1, 1986

The results of a survey of practicing attorneys in twelve districts concerning their experience with district court rules that limit the number of interrogatories one party may serve on another without leave of court to serve more.

Due Process at Sentencing: An Empirical and Legal Analysis of the Disclosure of Presentence Reports in Federal Courts

Stephen A. Fennell, William N. Hall

June 1, 1980

A factual and legal review of practices in courts and probation offices concerning the preparation and disclosure of presentence reports.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Discovery & Disclosure

Memo: Judicial Conference Guidance Regarding S. 2027

Letter: Senate Judiciary Committee Questions for Judge Aubrey E. Robinson

Statement By The Honorable Robert F. Peckham About Title I Of S. 2648 Civil Justice Expense And Delay Reduction Plans

Judiciary Committee Questions for Judges Robinson and Enslen

Prepared Statement of Honorable Aubrey E. Robinson, Jr. Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia on Behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States Before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate on S. 2027,

Letter: Observations on the Present Senate Bill Entitled "Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990"

Memo: The Brookings Taskforce for Civil Reform Report "Justice for All"

Form 4: Guidelines for Discovery, Motion Practice and Trial

Attorneys' Views of Local Rules Limiting Interrogatories

Due Process at Sentencing: An Empirical and Legal Analysis of the Disclosure of Presentence Reports in Federal Courts

Pages