Federal Judicial Center Operational Status:

Due to a lapse in appropriations, the Federal Judicial Center (Center) has ceased all non-excepted activities until funding is restored.

The Center will post any changes in operational status on this web page. Please check back for updates.

U.S. District Courts

Displaying 591 - 600 of 847, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Patent Pilot Program: Five-Year Report

Margaret S. Williams, Rebecca N. Eyre, Joe S. Cecil

April 1, 2016

The Patent Pilot Program (PPP), a ten-year pilot program addressing the assignment of patent cases in certain U.S. district courts, was established on January 4, 2011, by Pub. L. No. 111-349.

Case Commentary: Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez, 134 S. Ct. 1224 (2014)

James D. Garbolino

March 5, 2016

Equitable Tolling | Return Despite Article 12 Defense | Delay | Settlement

Case Commentary: Van De Sande v. Van De Sande, 431 F.3d 567 (7th Cir. 2005)

James D. Garbolino

March 5, 2016

Grave Risk | Domestic Violence

Case Commentary: Souratgar v. Lee, 720 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2013)

James D. Garbolino

March 5, 2016

Article 20 | Domestic Violence | Degree of Violence | Grave Risk to Child | Syariah Law

Case Commentary: Sanchez v. R.G.L., 761 F.3d 495 (5th Cir. 2014)

James D. Garbolino

March 5, 2016

Unaccompanied Alien Children | Standing to Appeal

Facts

Case Commentary: West v. Dobrev, 735 F.3d 921 (10th Cir. 2013)

James D. Garbolino

March 5, 2016

Summary Judgment | Sua Sponte Orders

Case Commentary: Gomez v. Fuenmayor, 812 F.3d 1005 (11th Cir. 2016)

James D. Garbolino

March 4, 2016

Grave Risk | Domestic Violence

Even though the child is not directly harmed by violent conduct against a parent and his or her family, the child may be subjected to grave risk of physical and/or psychological harm as a result of that violence.

Case Commentary: Mozes v. Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2001)

James D. Garbolino

February 23, 2016

Habitual Residence

Mozes remains the most-followed case for determining habitual residence and stands out as the most-cited circuit case dealing with the 1980 Convention.

Facts

Case Commentary: Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S. Ct. 1017 (2013)

James D. Garbolino

February 2, 2016

Mootness | Stays | Expeditious Handling

Case Commentary: Abbott v. Abbott, 560 U.S. 1 (2010)

James D. Garbolino

January 21, 2016

Interpreting the Convention | Custody Rights | Ne Exeat Clauses^{^[1]}

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

U.S. District Courts

Patent Pilot Program: Five-Year Report

Case Commentary: Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez, 134 S. Ct. 1224 (2014)

Case Commentary: Van De Sande v. Van De Sande, 431 F.3d 567 (7th Cir. 2005)

Case Commentary: Souratgar v. Lee, 720 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2013)

Case Commentary: Sanchez v. R.G.L., 761 F.3d 495 (5th Cir. 2014)

Case Commentary: West v. Dobrev, 735 F.3d 921 (10th Cir. 2013)

Case Commentary: Gomez v. Fuenmayor, 812 F.3d 1005 (11th Cir. 2016)

Case Commentary: Mozes v. Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2001)

Case Commentary: Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S. Ct. 1017 (2013)

Case Commentary: Abbott v. Abbott, 560 U.S. 1 (2010)

Pages