You are here


Displaying 1 - 10 of 103, sorted by most recent
Format: 2021
Greater than or equal to
Robert Timothy Reagan
January 18, 2021

National Coalition on Black Civic Participation v. Wohl (Victor Marrero, S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-8668)
A district judge required private parties who had made robocalls threatening voters with false statements about voting by mail to make curative robocalls.

Robert Timothy Reagan
December 3, 2020

Murray v. Cuomo (Mary Kay Vyskocil, 1:20-cv-3571) and Eisen v. Cuomo (Philip M. Halpern, 7:20-cv-5121) (S.D.N.Y.)

James D. Garbolino
November 25, 2020

Jurisdiction | Standing | Redressability

Robert Timothy Reagan
November 21, 2020

Gallagher v. New York State Board of Elections (Analisa Torres, S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-5504)

Robert Timothy Reagan
November 4, 2020

Yang v. New York State Board of Elections (Analisa Torres, S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-3325)

Robert Timothy Reagan
November 3, 2020

Powell v. Benson (Gershwin A. Drain, E.D. Mich. 2:20-cv-11023), Drenth v. Boockvar (Jennifer P. Wilson, M.D. Pa. 1:20-cv-829), and Hernandez v. New York State Board of Elections (Lewis J. Liman, S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-4003)

Robert Timothy Reagan
July 3, 2020

Abulafia v. Richman (Katherine Polk Failla, S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-3547)
Five candidates who challenged their exclusion from primary election ballots were denied immediate relief for reasons explained orally but not included in the publicly accessible record.

Robert Timothy Reagan
September 5, 2019

Hill v. Williams (1:16-cv-2627) and Harlos v. Morrissey (1:16-cv-2649) (Christine M. Arguello, D. Colo.), Silberberg v. Board of Elections (P. Kevin Castel, S.D.N.Y. 1:16-cv-8336), and ACLU of Northern California v. Padilla (William Alsup, N.D. Cal. 3:16-cv-6287)

July 27, 2017

The Advisory Group to the New York State–Federal Judicial Council completed a best practices document on interpreters in federal and New York state courts that was approved on May 18, 2015 by the New York State–Federal Judicial Council.

July 27, 2017

The Advisory Group to the New York State–Federal Judicial Council analyzed New York State and federal courts’ treatment of prelitigation conduct involving the creation, retention, and destruction of electronically stored information (ESI) to determine whether the courts were consistent and harmon


Subscribe to S.D.N.Y.