You are here

D. Minn.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 24
Contains
Contains
Format: 2019
Greater than or equal to
January 24, 2019
Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

Minnesota Majority v. Mansky (Joan N. Ericksen, D. Minn. 0:10-cv-4401)

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 4 pages
October 23, 2018
Robert Timothy Reagan

Baca v. Hickenlooper (Wiley Y. Daniel, D. Colo. 1:16-cv-2986), Chiafalo v. Inslee (James L. Robart, W.D. Wash. 2:16-cv-1886), Koller v. Brown (Edward J. Davila, N.D. Cal. 5:16-cv-7069), and Abdurrahman v. Dayton (Paul A. Magnuson, D. Minn. No. 0:16-cv-4279)

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 5 pages
January 1, 2014
Meghan A. Dunn

This report summarizes the results of a Center survey of district court judges to assess the frequency with which jurors used social media to communicate during trials and deliberations in the past two years, and to identify strategies for curbing this behavior. The survey was conducted at the request of the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management. The survey also assessed the frequency with which attorneys use social media to conduct research on potential jurors during voir dire.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Download 52 pages
July 18, 2013
Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

ACLU of Minnesota v. Kiffmeyer (James M. Rosenbaum, D. Minn. 0:04-cv-4653)
The court determined that recognizing tribal photo identification cards as proof of both identity and address only if the voter resided on a reservation violated equal protection. While the case was pending, the legislature brought the state’s law into compliance.
Topics: Voter identification; Help America Vote Act (HAVA); equal protection.

One of many Case Studies in Emergency Election Litigation.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 2 pages
June 1, 2011

Assembled here are protective orders used by federal judges in criminal prosecutions in national security cases. Among the most important goals of the protective orders here is the protection of classified information.

Superseded by National Security Prosecutions: Protective Orders (2014).

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Download 307 pages
July 9, 2009
John R. Tunheim

United States v. Warsame (D. Minn. 0:04-cr-29).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:
October 3, 2008
John R. Tunheim

United States v. Warsame (D. Minn. 0:04-cr-29).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:
January 1, 2008
Carol L. Krafka, Donna J. Stienstra, Patricia A. Lombard, Rebecca N. Eyre

At the request of the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, the Federal Judicial Center conducted a study of the use of courtrooms in the U.S. district courts. The committee requested the study in response to a November 2005 congressional subcommittee request for an empirical study of the use of federal courtrooms. The study was conducted between early 2006 and spring 2008, with data collected in twenty-six district courts during the period January 15 - July 15, 2007.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Download 273 pages
April 20, 2007
John R. Tunheim

United States v. Warsame (D. Minn. 0:04-cr-29).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:
March 8, 2005
John R. Tunheim

United States v. Warsame (D. Minn. 0:04-cr-29).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:

Pages

Subscribe to D. Minn.