10th Cir.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 77, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Case Commentary: Dawson v. Dylla, No. 21-1225, 2021 WL 5232251 (10th Cir. Nov. 10, 2021)

James D. Garbolino

November 16, 2022

Younger Abstention

A parent sought an order compelling a federal court to modify and enforce the custody decision of a state court.

Holding

Case Commentary: Pope v. Lunday, No. 20-6003, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 36618 (10th Cir. Nov. 20, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

February 16, 2021

Habitual Residence of Infants | Lack of Necessity of Evidentiary Hearing

Case Commentary: Watts v. Watts, 935 F.3d 1138 (10th Cir. 2019)

James D. Garbolino

March 23, 2020

Habitual Residence | Parental Intent | Acclimatization | Time-Limited Relocations

Case Commentary: Takeshi Ogawa v. Kyong Kang, 946 F.3d 1176 (10th Cir. 2020)

James D. Garbolino

March 23, 2020

Custody Rights^{^[1]}

Case Commentary: West v. Dobrev, 735 F.3d 921 (10th Cir. 2013)

James D. Garbolino

March 5, 2016

Summary Judgment | Sua Sponte Orders

Report of a Survey of Videoconferencing in the Courts of Appeals

Meghan A. Dunn, Rebecca Norwick

January 1, 2006

This report describes the ways in which videoconferencing is used in the courts of appeals.

Analysis of Briefing Requirements in the United States Courts of Appeals

Marie Leary

November 30, 2004

The Federal Judicial Center prepared this report to assist the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure to evaluate reported problems with and potential amendments to Rules 28 and 32 on the content and cover of briefs.

1996 Annual Assessment of the Condition of the Court's Civil and Criminal Dockets United States District Court for the District of New Mexico

James A. Parker, Civil Justice Advisory Group for the District of New Mexico

May 27, 1997

Judge James A. Parker transmits the 1996 Annual Assessment of the Condition of the Court's Civil and Criminal Dockets for the District of New Mexico to members of the Civil Justice Advisory Group

District of New Mexico Process Innovation Report, August 1996

Robert March

August 23, 1996

Clerk of the Court Robert M. March transmits the District of New Mexico's Process Innovation Report to Abel J. Mattos of the Administrative Office. March describes the report as "an important aspect of the development of the electronic filing Advanced Court Engineering (ACE) project."

1994 Annual Assessment for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Western District of Oklahoma

June 1, 1996

The 1994 Periodic Assessment of civil justice reform efforts in the Western District of Oklahoma

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

10th Cir.

Case Commentary: Dawson v. Dylla, No. 21-1225, 2021 WL 5232251 (10th Cir. Nov. 10, 2021)

Case Commentary: Pope v. Lunday, No. 20-6003, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 36618 (10th Cir. Nov. 20, 2020)

Case Commentary: Watts v. Watts, 935 F.3d 1138 (10th Cir. 2019)

Case Commentary: Takeshi Ogawa v. Kyong Kang, 946 F.3d 1176 (10th Cir. 2020)

Case Commentary: West v. Dobrev, 735 F.3d 921 (10th Cir. 2013)

Report of a Survey of Videoconferencing in the Courts of Appeals

Analysis of Briefing Requirements in the United States Courts of Appeals

1996 Annual Assessment of the Condition of the Court's Civil and Criminal Dockets United States District Court for the District of New Mexico

District of New Mexico Process Innovation Report, August 1996

1994 Annual Assessment for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Pages