You are here

Research Reports

Displaying 301 - 310 of 345, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2025
Greater than or equal to
January 1, 1977

A report on the role of the federal courts in handling "conditions of confinement" complaints by both state and federal prisoners, with emphasis on state cases brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983.

Federal Judicial Center, Federal Judicial Center Research Division
January 1, 1977

An attempt to develop estimates of relative workload in the courts of appeals without detailed timekeeping by judges. Judges estimated the relative workload associated with various appeal types, and their estimates were used to calculate case weights.

Francine Tilewick
January 1, 1977

A brief analysis of the judicial disqualification statute, 28 U.S.C. Section 455, with an index and annotations of reported decisions construing the statute.

Steven Flanders
January 1, 1977

An oft-cited analysis of the differences between court management procedures resulting in fast versus slow processing and those resulting in high versus low rates of disposition.

Norval Morris, C. Ranlet Lincoln
January 1, 1976

This report to the Federal Judicial Center by staff of the University of Chicago Law School (Norval Morris) and University Extension (C.

January 1, 1976

A description of techniques, equipment, and procedures for videotaping depositions. The report includes forms, state and federal rules, cases, and a listing of articles on this subject.

Sentencing Institute for the Sixth and Seventh Circuits
November 11, 1975

This document was used during a Sentencing Institute for the Sixth and Ninth Circuits, held November 11-14, 1975. Using a hypothetical case, it presents:

October 1, 1975

A summary of the first phase of the Center's project to develop a caseload forecasting model. The study concludes that indicator-based forecasts can and should be used to help allocate district court resources.

Maurice Rosenberg
May 13, 1975

A discussion of types of cases in which judicial discretionbased on facts and guided by lawis applied in trial courts.

Pages

Subscribe to Research Reports