You are here

National Security

Displaying 1 - 10 of 180, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2026
Greater than or equal to
Erwin Chemerinsky, Paul Clement, Elizabeth C. Wiggins
February 12, 2026

First Amendment. Speech. Experts discuss the Supreme Court decisions applying intermediate scrutiny to speech restrictions encompassing both protected and unprotected speech in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, and to restrictions on foreign ownership of a social media platform in TikTok v. Garland.

James A. Wynn Jr.
January 9, 2026

Opinion, United States v. Al-Timimi, No. 14-4451 (4th Cir. Jan. 9, 2026), ___ F.4th ___, 2026 WL 71062 (“The First Amendment does not permit the Government to imprison a person for speech unless that speech falls within a narrow and well-defined category of unprotected expressions . . . .”).

August 26, 2025

Opinion, Havlish v. Taliban, No. 23-258 (2d Cir. Aug. 26, 2025), D.E. 216, 217, ___ F.4th ___, 2025 WL 2447193.

August 14, 2025

Opinion, Long v. Bondi, No. 24-1369 (4th Cir. Aug. 14, 2025), D.E. 59, 151 F.4th 503.

Bradley N. Garcia
June 17, 2025

Opinion, Al-Baluchi v. Hegseth, No. 23-5251 (D.C. Cir. June 17, 2025), 140 F.4th 517.

George B. Daniels
May 29, 2025

Opinion, In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, No. 1:03-md-1570 (S.D.N.Y. May 29, 2025), D.E. 10988.

George B. Daniels
May 29, 2025

Opinion, In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, No. 1:03-md-1570 (S.D.N.Y. May 29, 2025), D.E. 10989.

George B. Daniels
May 29, 2025

Opinion, In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, No. 1:03-md-1570 (S.D.N.Y. May 29, 2025), D.E. 10980.

George B. Daniels
May 29, 2025

Opinion, In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, No. 1:03-md-1570 (S.D.N.Y. May 29, 2025), D.E. 10986.

Sarah Netburn
April 17, 2025

Report and Recommendation, In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, No. 1:03-md-1570 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2025), D.E. 10876.

Pages

Subscribe to National Security