Federal Judicial Center Operational Status:

Due to a lapse in appropriations, the Federal Judicial Center (Center) has ceased all non-excepted activities until funding is restored.

The Center will post any changes in operational status on this web page. Please check back for updates.

D. Or.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 22, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Does the Electoral College Dilute Votes?

Robert Timothy Reagan

November 3, 2023

Park v. Parnell (Timothy M. Burgess, D. Alaska 3:16-cv-281), James v. Cascos (Robert Pitman and Jeffrey C. Manske, W.D. Tex. 6:16-cv-457), Conant v. Oregon (Marco A. Hernandez, D. Or. 3:16-cv-2290), and Barnes v. Wisconsin (William C. Griesbach, E.D. Wis. 1:16-cv-1692)

Required Ballot Notice for a Levy Initiative

Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

October 6, 2023

Horton v. Multnomah County (Ancer L. Haggerty, D. Or. 3:03-cv-1257)

Challenge to a Ballot-Initiative Financial Impact Estimate

Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

July 11, 2023

Oregonians for Accountability v. Bradbury (Garr M. King, D. Or. 3:04-cv-1170)

Ballot-Petition Signature Requirements in Oregon During a Pandemic

Robert Timothy Reagan

July 5, 2023

People Not Politicians Oregon v. Clarno (Michael J. McShane, D. Or. 6:20-cv-1053)

Jurors' Use of Social Media During Trials and Deliberations: A Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management

Meghan A. Dunn

November 22, 2011

The Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management (CACM) asked the Federal Judicial Center to develop and administer a short survey of district court judges to assess the frequency with which jurors use social media to communicate about cases during trial and deliberat

Letter Rogatory

Michael Robert Hogan

April 16, 2010

Minutes, United States v. Sedaghaty, No. 6:05-cr-60008 (D. Or. Apr. 16, 2010), D.E. 269.

Protective Order

Michael Robert Hogan

March 19, 2010

Protective Order, United States v. Sedaghaty, No. 6:05-cr-60008 (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2010), D.E. 297.

Appendix C-2: Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit — Amended CJA Capital Habeas Costs Policy

March 1, 2010

Saudi Arabian Bank Subpoena Opinion

Michael Robert Hogan

February 26, 2010

Opinion, United States v. Sedaghaty, No. 6:05-cr-60008 (D. Or. Feb. 26, 2010), D.E. 277, 2010 WL 11643384.

MLAT and Letter Rogatory Opinion

Michael Robert Hogan

January 26, 2010

Opinion, United States v. Sedaghaty, No. 6:05-cr-60008 (D. Or. Jan. 26, 2010), D.E. 252, 2010 WL 11643383.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

D. Or.

Does the Electoral College Dilute Votes?

Required Ballot Notice for a Levy Initiative

Challenge to a Ballot-Initiative Financial Impact Estimate

Ballot-Petition Signature Requirements in Oregon During a Pandemic

Jurors' Use of Social Media During Trials and Deliberations: A Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management

Letter Rogatory

Protective Order

Appendix C-2: Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit — Amended CJA Capital Habeas Costs Policy

Saudi Arabian Bank Subpoena Opinion

MLAT and Letter Rogatory Opinion

Pages