You are here

Article I

Displaying 1 - 9 of 9, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Erwin Chemerinsky, Michael McConnell, Hamid M. Khan
October 12, 2023

Preemption. NLRA. Experts discuss the foreseeable, aggravated and imminent danger needed to remove unions from protection under the National Labor Relations Act and to allow actions in state courts to proceed.

Erwin Chemerinsky, Michael McConnell, Hamid M. Khan
October 12, 2023

Dormant Commerce Clause. Experts discuss the reaffirmation of the Pike balancing test and express different interpretations of the Supreme Court’s treatment of extra-territoriality principles.

Erwin Chemerinsky, Michael McConnell, Shelly A. Easter
September 28, 2023

Civil Rights. Title VII. §1983. Experts discuss the greater religious accommodation requirements for employers the Supreme Court outlines in Groff v. DeJoy, and the continuing availability of §1983 to enforce some private rights created by statutes adopted under the Spending Clause in Health and Hosp. Corp. of Marion Ctny. v. Talevski.

Erwin Chemerinsky, Tara L. Grove, James A. Chance
September 28, 2023

First Amendment. Public Accommodations. Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s emerging artistic expression exception to public accommodations laws, and the opinion’s potential impact on anti-discrimination laws in general.

Erwin Chemerinsky, Michael McConnell, Elizabeth C. Wiggins
October 11, 2022
Erwin Chemerinsky, Tara L. Grove, Elizabeth C. Wiggins
October 5, 2022

The right to bear arms. Experts discuss the Court’s 2nd Amendment expansion to include the right to bear and keep arms outside of the home, and the difficulty of applying the Court’s historical analysis test to new regulations.

Laurie Levenson, Evan Lee, Elizabeth C. Wiggins
September 28, 2022

Civil Rights. §1983. Malicious Prosecution and Miranda Warnings.  Experts discuss how the Court resolved a circuit split as to what constitutes a favorable outcome allowing a claim for malicious prosecution to go forward, and whether violations of Miranda warning rules can support a claim under §1983. 

Laurie Levenson, Evan Lee, Elizabeth C. Wiggins
September 28, 2022

Civil Rights. §1983 and Bivens. Excessive Force. Experts discuss what is required for precedent to put officers on notice of actions deemed unconstitutional, as well as the likelihood that new claims will ever be recognized under Bivens.

Paul Clement, James A. Chance
September 21, 2022

Administrative Law. Experts discuss the limits of agency authority and the emerging Major Questions Doctrine in the context of employer COVID vaccination and testing requirements.

Subscribe to Article I