You are here

D. Or.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 21
Contains
Contains
Format: 2019
Greater than or equal to
July 10, 2018
Robert Timothy Reagan

Park v. Parnell (Timothy M. Burgess, D. Alaska 3:16-cv-281), James v. Cascos (Robert Pitman and Jeffrey C. Manske, W.D. Tex. 6:16-cv-457), Conant v. Oregon (Marco A. Hernandez, D. Or. 3:16-cv-2290), and Barnes v. Wisconsin (William C. Griesbach, E.D. Wis. 1:16-cv-1692)

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 4 pages
July 11, 2017
Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

Oregonians for Accountability v. Bradbury (Garr M. King, D. Or. 3:04-cv-1170)
The district judge dismissed a complaint alleging that a financial impact estimate accompanying a ballot initiative was misleading, because the measure text, summary, and explanatory text would make clear to the voters what the measure would do.
Topics: Ballot language; ballot measure; laches.

One of many Case Studies in Emergency Election Litigation.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 1 page
July 11, 2017
Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

Horton v. Multnomah County (Ancer L. Haggerty, D. Or. 3:03-cv-1257)
The district judge enjoined application of a statute requiring a possibly misleading notice on ballot initiatives for new levies stating that property taxes could increase by more than three percent if the initiative passed, leaving unstated that an increase that high would only arise from the maximum increase in assessments permitted by law. The court of appeals vacated the injunction pending appeal and reversed the injunction two years later.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Case Study 3 pages
November 22, 2011
Meghan A. Dunn

The Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management (CACM) asked the Federal Judicial Center to develop and administer a short survey of district court judges to assess the frequency with which jurors use social media to communicate about cases during trial and deliberation. The survey also sought to identify strategies judges have found to be effective and appropriate in curbing this behavior. This report presents the findings from the survey.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Download 41 pages
April 16, 2010
Michael Robert Hogan

United States v. Sedaghaty (D. Or. 6:05-cr-60008).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:
March 19, 2010
Michael Robert Hogan

United States v. Sedaghaty (D. Or. 6:05-cr-60008).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:
February 26, 2010
Michael Robert Hogan

United States v. Sedaghaty (D. Or. 6:05-cr-60008).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:
January 26, 2010
Michael Robert Hogan

United States v. Sedaghaty (D. Or. 6:05-cr-60008).

This document is among Selected Orders and Other Case Documents that, in turn, are among the Center's resources on National Security Cases.

Downloadable file:
January 1, 2008
Carol L. Krafka, Donna J. Stienstra, Patricia A. Lombard, Rebecca N. Eyre

At the request of the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, the Federal Judicial Center conducted a study of the use of courtrooms in the U.S. district courts. The committee requested the study in response to a November 2005 congressional subcommittee request for an empirical study of the use of federal courtrooms. The study was conducted between early 2006 and spring 2008, with data collected in twenty-six district courts during the period January 15 - July 15, 2007.

Downloadable file:
PDF icon Download 273 pages

Pages

Subscribe to D. Or.