Experts

Displaying 21 - 30 of 36, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Memoranda re Budget Meeting with Counsel — District of Connecticut 3

March 2, 2006

Memoranda re Budget Meeting with Counsel — District of Connecticut 1

March 2, 2006

Inconsistency in Evidentiary Standards for Medical Testimony: Disorder in the Courts

Jerome P. Kassirer, Joe S. Cecil

September 18, 2002

The Supreme Court, based on three decisions over the past decade, now requires judges to examine the underlying basis of all testimony to ensure that only expert testimony supported by valid methods if inquiry is introduced as evidence in litigation.

Neutral Science Panels: Two Examples of Panels of Court-Appointed Experts in the Breast Implants Product Liability Litigation

Laural L. Hooper, Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging

June 15, 2001

This report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management describes two different types of independent panels used in the silicone gel breast implants litigation.

Order Appointing Psychologist — Western District of Missouri

May 18, 2001

Order Appointing Mitigation Experts — Western District of Missouri

May 18, 2001

Sample Case Budget from the Death Penalty Resource Counsel

May 1, 2001

Expert Testimony in Federal Civil Trials: A Preliminary Analysis

Carol L. Krafka, Joe S. Cecil, Molly Johnson

January 1, 2000

In 1998, the Federal Judicial Center surveyed federal judges about their experiences with expert testimony in civil cases.

How Science Works [Superseded]

David Goodstein

January 1, 2000

Use of Expert Testimony, Specialized Decision Makers, and Case-Management Innovations in the National Vaccine Compensation Program

Carol E. Drew, D. Dean P. Miletich, Molly Johnson

January 1, 1998

A report on the Center's study of the vaccine injury program. The report examines why the program was created, its implementation, the filing and termination rates over its course, and participants' views of the program.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here