Civil Litigation & Procedure

Displaying 141 - 150 of 1349, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Case Commentary: Nicolson v. Pappalardo, 605 F.3d 100 (1st Cir. 2010)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Consent and Acquiescence

Article 13 establishes a defense to return when the left-behind parent has consented or acquiesced to the removal or retention of the child. Consent or acquiescence, however, must be clearly established.

Facts

Case Commentary: Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Abstention | Child Well Settled | Equitable Estoppel | Delay

Case Commentary: Mendez v. May, 778 F.3d 337 (1st Cir. 2015)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Habitual Residence

Facts

Case Commentary: E.R.S.C. v. Carlwig (In re A.L.C.), 607 Fed. Appx. 658 (9th Cir. 2015)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Habitual Residence

Facts

Case Commentary: Karkkainen v. Kovalchuk, 445 F.3d 280 (3d Cir. 2006)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Habitual Residence

Case Commentry: Friedrich v. Friedrich (Friedrich I), 983 F.2d 1396 (6th Cir. 1993), & Friedrich v. Friedrich (Friedrich II), 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Habitual Residence | Rights of Custody | Grave Risk | Consent and Acquiescence

Case Commentary: Danaipour v. McLarey (Danaipour I), 286 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2002), & Danaipour v. McLarey (Danaipour II), 386 F.3d 289 (1st Cir. 2004)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Grave Risk | Sexual Abuse of Child

The Danaipour cases deal with the responsibilities of trial courts to hear and rule on defenses to return as opposed to relying upon the courts or services of the habitual residence to inquire into allegations of abuse.

Case Commentary: Cuellar v. Joyce (Cuellar I), 596 F.3d 505 (9th Cir. 2010), & Cuellar v. Joyce (Cuellar II), 603 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2010)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Grave Risk | Attorneys’ Fees

Cuellar I: Grave Risk

Case Commentary: Blondin v. Dubois (Blondin I), 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999), & Blondin v. Dubois (Blondin II), 238 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2001)

James D. Garbolino

January 20, 2016

Grave Risk | Domestic Violence

Case Commentary: Barzilay v. Barzilay (Barzilay I), 536 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2008), & Barzilay v. Barzilay (Barzilay II), 600 F.3d 912 (8th Cir. 2010)

James D. Garbolino

January 19, 2016

Abstention | Habitual Residence

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Civil Litigation & Procedure

Case Commentary: Nicolson v. Pappalardo, 605 F.3d 100 (1st Cir. 2010)

Case Commentary: Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998)

Case Commentary: Mendez v. May, 778 F.3d 337 (1st Cir. 2015)

Case Commentary: E.R.S.C. v. Carlwig (In re A.L.C.), 607 Fed. Appx. 658 (9th Cir. 2015)

Case Commentary: Karkkainen v. Kovalchuk, 445 F.3d 280 (3d Cir. 2006)

Case Commentry: Friedrich v. Friedrich (Friedrich I), 983 F.2d 1396 (6th Cir. 1993), & Friedrich v. Friedrich (Friedrich II), 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996)

Case Commentary: Danaipour v. McLarey (Danaipour I), 286 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2002), & Danaipour v. McLarey (Danaipour II), 386 F.3d 289 (1st Cir. 2004)

Case Commentary: Cuellar v. Joyce (Cuellar I), 596 F.3d 505 (9th Cir. 2010), & Cuellar v. Joyce (Cuellar II), 603 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2010)

Case Commentary: Blondin v. Dubois (Blondin I), 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999), & Blondin v. Dubois (Blondin II), 238 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2001)

Case Commentary: Barzilay v. Barzilay (Barzilay I), 536 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2008), & Barzilay v. Barzilay (Barzilay II), 600 F.3d 912 (8th Cir. 2010)

Pages