You are here

Reports & Studies

Below is a list of a number of past published studies conducted by the Research Division. Some Center reports are not published or made publicly available due to restrictions in place from the source of the research request. Most research reports can be downloaded and in some instances, a hardcopy publication can be requested. See also Manuals, Monographs, & Guides.

Displaying 341 - 346 of 346
Will return exact match for word(s) entered
Title Datesort descending
Appeals of Sua Sponte Remand Orders in Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) Removals, 2014–2023

This study examines how often sua sponte remands were ordered in putative class actions removed to federal court on Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) grounds and how often appeals of those sua sponte remand orders were sought.

June 5, 2025
Intervention in the Federal Courts of Appeals

Prepared for the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, this report examines motions to intervene on appeal. Intervention at the beginning of a case is studied in a two-year filing cohort, and intervention at the end of a case, such as after argument or judgment, is examined in a four-year termination cohort.

July 14, 2025
Review of Local Bankruptcy Rules, Orders, and Procedures Governing Redaction of Private Information in Federal Court Filings

At the request of the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management (CACM), the Federal Judicial Center reviewed the local court rules of bankruptcy courts to identify rules requiring redaction of specified private information from court filings.

August 4, 2025
Review of Local District and Appellate Rules Governing Redaction of Private Information in Federal Court Filings

At the request of the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management (CACM), the Federal Judicial Center reviewed the local court rules of the district and appellate courts to identify rules requiring redaction of specified private information from court filings.

August 4, 2025
Supplemental Analysis of Unredacted Social Security Numbers in Federal Court PACER Documents

At the request of the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management (CACM), the Federal Judicial Center completed a supplemental analysis of unredacted Social Security numbers (SSNs) identified in its 2024 study Unredacted Social Security Numbers in Federal Court PACER Documents. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether unredacted personally identifiable information (PII) is more common in particular types of court filings and proceedings.

August 4, 2025
Unredacted Personally Identifiable Information in Federal Court PACER Documents

Appellate Rule 25(a)(5), Bankruptcy Rule 9037, Civil Rule 5.2, and Criminal Rule 49.1 require parties and nonparties to redact certain personally identifiable information (PII) in documents they file with the federal courts, including Social Security numbers (SSNs), individual taxpayer identification numbers (ITINs), birthdates, minors’ names, financial account numbers, and, in criminal filings, home addresses.

The Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management (CACM) has also encouraged courts to redact the names of nongovernment parties in publicly available Social Security and immigration opinions and orders (including reports and recommendations) to protect the privacy of the individuals involved. 

Following its December 2022 meeting, CACM asked the Federal Judicial Center (Center) to conduct the following research:

  • estimate the prevalence of unredacted SSNs, ITINs, birthdates, minors’ names, financial account numbers, and, in criminal cases, individuals’ home addresses in federal court documents available in the Public Access to Electronic Records (PACER) service.
  • determine whether unredacted PII is more common in particular types of court filings and proceedings, especially pro se filings, guardian ad litem documents, filings in Social Security actions, notices of removal from state court, and proof of claim filings in bankruptcy cases.
  • assess how often full nongovernment party names are included in opinions and orders in Social Security and immigration cases.

Below are links to the Center’s final project report summarizing all research findings, along with previously completed reports and memorandums containing research findings as presented to the committee over the course of the project (see Attachments A-J).

Click here for an overview of the Center’s research findings.

May 21, 2026

Pages