Alternatives to Litigation: Do They Have a Place in the Federal District Courts?
Donna Stienstra; Thomas E. Willging
1995, 68 pages
(In Print: Available for Distribution)
Long Range Planning Series, Paper No. 4
A discussion paper that analyzes arguments for and against incorporating ADR programs into the case-management procedures of federal district courts. The authors debate issues such as whether ADR is compatible with the role of the federal courts, whether ADR conserves litigants' costs and court resources, whether private or public-sector development of ADR is preferable, and whether mandatory or voluntary programs should be pursued.



Link or download
Table of contents

More in this Collection or Series:
Long Range Planning Series

More on the Subject(s):
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Case Management--Civil
Long Range Planning